rat osteogenic sarcoma cell line Search Results


95
ATCC rat osteogenic sarcoma
Rat Osteogenic Sarcoma, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat osteogenic sarcoma/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat osteogenic sarcoma - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
ATCC umr 108 rat osteosarcoma cells
Umr 108 Rat Osteosarcoma Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/umr 108 rat osteosarcoma cells/product/ATCC
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
umr 108 rat osteosarcoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Lonza rat umr-106 osteosarcoma cell line 75
Rat Umr 106 Osteosarcoma Cell Line 75, supplied by Lonza, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat umr-106 osteosarcoma cell line 75/product/Lonza
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat umr-106 osteosarcoma cell line 75 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Merck & Co ros17 2 8 rat osteosarcoma cells
Ros17 2 8 Rat Osteosarcoma Cells, supplied by Merck & Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ros17 2 8 rat osteosarcoma cells/product/Merck & Co
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ros17 2 8 rat osteosarcoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
ATCC canine osteosarcoma d17 cells
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Canine Osteosarcoma D17 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/canine osteosarcoma d17 cells/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
canine osteosarcoma d17 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Procell Inc rat osteosarcoma cells umr 106
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Rat Osteosarcoma Cells Umr 106, supplied by Procell Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rat osteosarcoma cells umr 106/product/Procell Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat osteosarcoma cells umr 106 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Thermo Fisher gene exp fos rn02396759 m1
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Gene Exp Fos Rn02396759 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp fos rn02396759 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp fos rn02396759 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC c6 rat glioma candidate yes llc mouse lung carcinoma candidate yes k7m2 mouse osteosarcoma candidate yes a172 human brain control
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
C6 Rat Glioma Candidate Yes Llc Mouse Lung Carcinoma Candidate Yes K7m2 Mouse Osteosarcoma Candidate Yes A172 Human Brain Control, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/c6 rat glioma candidate yes llc mouse lung carcinoma candidate yes k7m2 mouse osteosarcoma candidate yes a172 human brain control/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c6 rat glioma candidate yes llc mouse lung carcinoma candidate yes k7m2 mouse osteosarcoma candidate yes a172 human brain control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
RayBiotech inc aah-blm-1
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Aah Blm 1, supplied by RayBiotech inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/aah-blm-1/product/RayBiotech inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
aah-blm-1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
ATCC umr 106 01 rat osteosarcoma cells
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Umr 106 01 Rat Osteosarcoma Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/umr 106 01 rat osteosarcoma cells/product/ATCC
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
umr 106 01 rat osteosarcoma cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
ATCC saos 2 cells
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Saos 2 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/saos 2 cells/product/ATCC
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
saos 2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher gene exp fos mm00487425 m1
An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine <t>D17</t> cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.
Gene Exp Fos Mm00487425 M1, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gene exp fos mm00487425 m1/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gene exp fos mm00487425 m1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.

Journal: Journal of Virology

Article Title: Computational and Functional Analysis of the Virus-Receptor Interface Reveals Host Range Trade-Offs in New World Arenaviruses

doi: 10.1128/JVI.01408-15

Figure Lengend Snippet: An extended region of TfR1 determines species specificity of Machupo virus entry. (A) An alignment of one portion of the TfR1 apical domain is shown for host and nonhost species. The amino acid numbering corresponds to human TfR1. The three residues experiencing recurrent positive selection, as previously defined (28), are highlighted in yellow. In blue type, a strategy is summarized that was previously used to map the Machupo virus-binding interface on TfR1 (19). In that previous work, this region was swapped from the human TfR1 (RLVYL) into the house mouse (M. musculus) TfR1, replacing the corresponding 4 residues (NLDP). In the present work, residues in the C. callosus TfR1 were swapped into the rat TfR1 to create the rat-short (red type) and rat-long (red plus green type) chimeric TfR1s shown in the bottom two lines. Also shown is the position of the L212V human SNP discussed in this study. (B) The cocrystal structure shows the interaction between Machupo virus GP1 (blue) and the human TfR1 apical domain (gray) (PDB code 3KAS) (18). The residue positions mutated in the rat-short TfR1 chimera are shown in brown. The residue positions mutated in the rat-long chimera are shown in green and brown. (C) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of Machupo pseudovirus (GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein [GP]). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 3 times with similar results seen in all experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−8). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). C.c, C. callosus; r-l, rat-long; r-s, rat-short; r, rat. (D) A Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel shows purified Machupo virus GP1 fused to the human IgG1 Fc fragment. (E) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gels show the five purified TfR1 proteins. (F) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of Machupo virus GP1 to each of the purified TfR1s. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells, and then GP1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression.

Article Snippet: Human embryonic kidney 293T cells (ATCC) and canine osteosarcoma D17 cells (ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units ml −1 penicillin, 100 μg ml −1 streptomycin, and 2 mM l -glutamine (Cellgro).

Techniques: Virus, Selection, Binding Assay, Residue, Stable Transfection, Infection, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Staining, SDS Page, Purification, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Incubation

Virus-specific effects on entry through TfR1. (A) The Chapare virus GP1 (blue) was homology modeled on the Machupo virus GP1 crystal structure (magenta; PDB code 3KAS). The Machupo virus GP1 loop 10 and surrounding residues are shown in light pink where divergence in structure is seen in the Chapare virus GP1. Similar results were seen with Sabia and Junin virus models (data not shown). (B) An alignment illustrates the C-terminal region of GP1 from Machupo, Junin, Sabia, Chapare, and Guanarito arenaviruses. Residues identical to those in Machupo virus have been replaced with dots. Machupo virus GP1 sites that make contact with TfR1 (18) are indicated with red asterisks. They fall in loop 7, loop 10, and two upstream regions which are not shown. Loop 10 is longer in Machupo virus than in all other viruses. The numbering scheme is based on the Machupo virus protein. Note that the alignment differs somewhat from a similar alignment shown in reference 18. The differences in these alignments concern the exact placement of insertions and deletions but are within the range to be expected from different alignment approaches. This alignment was generated using MAFFT (47, 48). (C and D) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Sabia (C) or Chapare (D) virus glycoprotein (GP). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. Experiments were performed 2 times, with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−5; **, <1e−10). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). See legend to Fig. 2C for definitions of abbreviations.

Journal: Journal of Virology

Article Title: Computational and Functional Analysis of the Virus-Receptor Interface Reveals Host Range Trade-Offs in New World Arenaviruses

doi: 10.1128/JVI.01408-15

Figure Lengend Snippet: Virus-specific effects on entry through TfR1. (A) The Chapare virus GP1 (blue) was homology modeled on the Machupo virus GP1 crystal structure (magenta; PDB code 3KAS). The Machupo virus GP1 loop 10 and surrounding residues are shown in light pink where divergence in structure is seen in the Chapare virus GP1. Similar results were seen with Sabia and Junin virus models (data not shown). (B) An alignment illustrates the C-terminal region of GP1 from Machupo, Junin, Sabia, Chapare, and Guanarito arenaviruses. Residues identical to those in Machupo virus have been replaced with dots. Machupo virus GP1 sites that make contact with TfR1 (18) are indicated with red asterisks. They fall in loop 7, loop 10, and two upstream regions which are not shown. Loop 10 is longer in Machupo virus than in all other viruses. The numbering scheme is based on the Machupo virus protein. Note that the alignment differs somewhat from a similar alignment shown in reference 18. The differences in these alignments concern the exact placement of insertions and deletions but are within the range to be expected from different alignment approaches. This alignment was generated using MAFFT (47, 48). (C and D) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the wild-type and chimeric TfR1s with C-terminal FLAG tags. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Sabia (C) or Chapare (D) virus glycoprotein (GP). Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. Experiments were performed 2 times, with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−5; **, <1e−10). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (inset) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). See legend to Fig. 2C for definitions of abbreviations.

Article Snippet: Human embryonic kidney 293T cells (ATCC) and canine osteosarcoma D17 cells (ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units ml −1 penicillin, 100 μg ml −1 streptomycin, and 2 mM l -glutamine (Cellgro).

Techniques: Virus, Generated, Stable Transfection, Infection, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence

Human TfR1 L212V SNP has an opposite effect on the entry of related arenaviruses. (A) The L212 residue in TfR1 contacts loop 10 in the Machupo virus GP1 (PDB code 3KAS) (18). (B) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the human TfR1 either with L212 or bearing the human SNP mutation, L212V, both with a C-terminal FLAG tag. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of a GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein. Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−3). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (right) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). (C) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of the purified human L212 and L212V TfR1s to Machupo virus GP1. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells. GP1 was then incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression. pbs, phosphate-buffered saline. (D) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of the purified human L212 and L212V TfR1 to iron-loaded human transferrin. For the ELISA, purified TfR1 was bound to wells. Iron-loaded TfR1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression. (E and F) The experiment is the same as that in panel B. In this case, cells were infected over increasing volumes with a GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Junin (E) or Sabia (F) virus glycoprotein.

Journal: Journal of Virology

Article Title: Computational and Functional Analysis of the Virus-Receptor Interface Reveals Host Range Trade-Offs in New World Arenaviruses

doi: 10.1128/JVI.01408-15

Figure Lengend Snippet: Human TfR1 L212V SNP has an opposite effect on the entry of related arenaviruses. (A) The L212 residue in TfR1 contacts loop 10 in the Machupo virus GP1 (PDB code 3KAS) (18). (B) Canine D17 cells were transduced to stably express the human TfR1 either with L212 or bearing the human SNP mutation, L212V, both with a C-terminal FLAG tag. Cells were infected with increasing volumes of a GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Machupo virus glycoprotein. Cells were monitored for GFP expression to determine the percentage of infected cells. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. A t test was performed to determine if differences between mean values were statistically significant (*, <1e−3). Cell surface expression of TfR1 was monitored with a FLAG antibody via flow cytometry (right) concurrently with measurement of GFP signal. Expression is given as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). (C) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of the purified human L212 and L212V TfR1s to Machupo virus GP1. Purified TfR1 was bound to wells. GP1 was then incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression. pbs, phosphate-buffered saline. (D) ELISA comparing the relative binding affinities of the purified human L212 and L212V TfR1 to iron-loaded human transferrin. For the ELISA, purified TfR1 was bound to wells. Iron-loaded TfR1 was incubated at decreasing concentrations to determine the relative binding affinities. Error bars indicate standard deviations from three technical replicates. The experiment was performed 2 times with similar results seen in the two experiments; the graph represents data from one experiment. Curves were fitted using 4-parameter nonlinear regression. (E and F) The experiment is the same as that in panel B. In this case, cells were infected over increasing volumes with a GFP-encoding retrovirus pseudotyped with Junin (E) or Sabia (F) virus glycoprotein.

Article Snippet: Human embryonic kidney 293T cells (ATCC) and canine osteosarcoma D17 cells (ATCC) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 units ml −1 penicillin, 100 μg ml −1 streptomycin, and 2 mM l -glutamine (Cellgro).

Techniques: Residue, Virus, Stable Transfection, Mutagenesis, FLAG-tag, Infection, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Binding Assay, Purification, Incubation, Saline